Tag Archives: sustainability

The Economics of Trash, Foreign Affairs Magazine

My article, “The Economics of Trash”, was just released on the Foreign Affairs website.  Here is a teaser, and you can check out the full piece at ForeignAffairs.com

“The streets of India’s major cities look dirty, piles of waste rot in the corners of buildings, and plastic bottles crunch underfoot. But the grit hides an informal waste collection system so effective that, despite an increase in the sale of disposable, non-organic consumer goods in India in recent years, the trash that ends up in the hands of municipal garbage facilities is over 50 percent organic — that is, mostly food waste. In 2009, food scraps made up only 21 percent of non-recycled waste in the United States. India’s ubiquitous trash-pickers may seem to some an unfortunate byproduct of Western-style consumption, but where others see garbage many Indians see opportunity. In an informal glass market in Bangalore, I was offered three rupees for a green glass bottle. By selling three bottles, I could have earned enough for a local bus ride.

The country’s informal recycling sector, however, can only generate so much profit. It is constrained by its lack of capital and long-term investment…”  Go to Full Article

Understanding EWaste

During my research into municipal solid waste, I’ve had the opportunity to learn a lot about ewaste by talking to workers in the industry, interviewing leaders in organizations supporting better ewaste processing in India, and making a few site visits. My first experience with ewaste was a trip to an informal circuit board processor just outside of Delhi. Most of the pictures in this post are from that visit, which left me feeling slightly hung over and absolutely depressed. However a second trip to the second hand electronic dealers and ewaste recycling vendors in Seelampur, in Delhi, and a trip to Bangalore left me with many more questions. Ewaste is a one in all conflict with pollution, over-consumption, and neo-colonialism intertwined. Images of women and children picking apart old computers are now ubiquitous proof of global demise. But if you have been following me at all you won’t be surprised to hear that the issue is a bit more nuanced than we all imagine.

India is not a major importer of ewaste, or at least according to official numbers it is not – import laws currently prohibit the import of electronics for waste processing. Still in 2004 the national ewaste industry, according to Toxics Links, generated an annual revenue of $1.5 Billion, with expectations for major growth. In 2005, the waste advocacy group SAAHAS estimated that gold extraction

Women cleaning circuit boards.

alone from Bangalore’s budding e-waste recycling industry was worth about $1 million.

Some of this revenue is generated through imported waste – illegally or under the guise of donations. Even so ewaste in India is not simply a problem of developed countries cost dumping.

Indian consumption of computers, mobile phones, and televisions is generating about 400,000 tonnes of waste annually and is expected to grow at 10-15% per year. (As a reference, the US and China are the world leaders of EWaste production, with 2.3 and 3 million annual tonnes respectively.

Waste water drainage at an informal circuit board processor

China, also happens to be the world’s largest ewaste importer.) Even without imports this is enough to provide a steady supply of materials to the waste mining industry. India, following China’s lead, is crossing a line. It’s anyone’s guess as to whether the country will one day become a major force as an importer or exporter of ewaste, or both.

The danger posed by electronics arise from the mishandling of highly toxic chemicals such as lead, mercury, cadmium, PVC, beryllium, and flame retardants. In addition, acid wash, cyanide, and fire are employed to release the precious metals, all of which pose a danger to the handler. India has plenty of informal/backyard recyclers with terrible working and safety standards. However the industry is also extraordinary for its diversity. A circuit board processing operator might expose his/her workers to the fumes of a smelter and let  children play in polluted mud.

Plastic and second hand keyboard/printer dealer in Seelampur, Delhi

At the same time a different merchant, another cog in a long chain, might simply be in the business of breaking plastic and metal for sale and segregating refurbish able keyboards and printers. Such decentralization of the informal sector makes regulation of the industry all the more difficult.

Managers and owners of informal e-waste facilities are generally uneducated and running on small profit margins. Often they are not aware of the extent of the hazards in their business. While they do not work constantly with the hazardous substances that their laborers handle, they are at the facilities day in and day out. They take no more measures for their own on-site health than they do for their employees, which is nil. As is also the case in municipal solid waste, where safety standards are implemented the laborers themselves can be the biggest challenge to meeting new policy. The founder of E-Parisaraa, the country’s first sanitary ewaste processing facility, remembers when

These women work without gloves or masks, others in their group wear both.

he began operations he had to resort to threatening workers with fines if they did not wear gloves and masks, even after they had received training on the importance of such safety measures.

Top down supported centralization of the industry is required in order to eradicate danger to health and environment. In fact formalization campaigns are already underway in India, through the effort of NGOs and some government support. European governments, with a very active role played by the German aid organization Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (Formerly GTZ), have donated large

Open dumping behind circuit board processing site.

amounts of money to helping these campaigns. Including E-Parisaraa, which began as a formal and regulated company, there are already four formal for-profit ewaste processing centers in India that operate with international safety standards. Some of the waste that is processed in these units can still end up in the informal sector in India or dumped in other countries. However with a more centralized industry the trickle down of pollutants will be easier to monitor by the government and consumer watch dogs. This will be a long process, and will not find success if it focuses solely on the goal of meeting international safety standards and labor regulations. Rather it starts with teaching those in the informal sector the basics of business – how to keep accounts and pay taxes – while providing them with convincing arguments and incentives to stay in the system.

Children playing at an informal waste processing site.

The biggest hazard to health is posed by smelters, where circuit boards are melted, and phosphorous from the processing of screens. However, many of the other dangers can be addressed with surprisingly simple measures – masks, gloves, better soaps, and waste water management. Counter to common logic, when ISO standards are followed ewaste is a two way street. Without any companies meeting international standards for circuit board processing in India, E-Paisaraa has been selling its PCP boards and other intricate ewaste elements to Umicore for further mining in Belgium. The founder, P.Parthasarathy, is also working on a plan to sell circuit boards collected in the informal sector to Umicore, thereby taking them out of harmful circulation in India.

International regulation of the Ewaste industry is as difficult as you can imagine. The Basel Convention on the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste has attempted to clamp down on the ewaste trade. However, without ratification of the treaty by the US the convention is still working with baby teeth. Ewaste is also one of those things, like

Sitting down with a manager at an informal ewaste processing site.

old ships – that I would like to cover soon, which is a hazy category under the legal definition of hazardous waste. For example second hand computers which are sold or donated for use in another country might breakdown after they have arrived. They may also be imported illegally for the sole purpose of waste processing. But how do you tell the difference between the two in transit and how do you punish those who import illegally if there is no domestic monitoring. Legally it is unclear where the responsibility for such “wastes” lie.

Concerned waste producers are left between a rock and a hard place. It is nearly impossible to guarantee that your mobile phone or computer or television will be processed in a safe and secure manner. Although President Obama supports the drive for more domestic ewaste processing, the industry remains expensive as compared to ISO regulated companies in developing countries  and lags behind techno savvy processors in Europe. Many states are now enacting laws to ban any export of ewaste. However it’s unclear to me how effective banning the international ewaste trade will be. Another interesting route to address the ewaste problem is in the production processes. I’m not just talking about direct processing waste, which by the way is a forgotten problem in electronics. Better product design can help extend product life, replacement, and repair. Such thinking is not going to solve the waste problem on its own. But in a world of gray it’s an excellent way to start.

Survey Results

Thanks to everyone who participated in my survey. The  majority of you were from the US but there were respondents from all over the globe. Considering the highly scientific collection method and the statistically relevant response of 41 participants, I’m ready to make some sweeping statements about humanity’s relationship with trash.

cardboard

Four of you said you would save these for storage or shipping. I'm disappointed, I would have said Fort Building.

Recycling definitely won the day. Over 85% of you said that you would put used cardboard and a plastic tub in your recycling. Now the cardboard was probably an obvious answer. But let’s think a little bit about the plastic bottle. Although many of you do not have this in your homes, these types of jugs are typically made from  polycarbonate plastic (#7) and are not recycled. In the past year PET jugs which are recyclable have increased but the US recycling rate for all PET bottles in 2009 was still only 31%.

Also consider this. Garbage in most legal and policy definitions is defined as something discarded, or which is of no further value to the user. So

Water Jug

Some creative thinkers in this group! One of you said you would save this jug to use as a penny jar. Another insisted he/she could use it to make beer.

even when you place something in the recycling, it’s still garbage! When I asked these same questions to a room full of Indian students and lecturers a considerable number of them claimed that they would sell the cardboard. And the water jug, which is in common household use, is in fact on deposit and would be traded or returned to the manufacturer. What does this mean? It means that in India cardboard is not garbage, plastic water jugs are not garbage because for the end-user they contain a monetary value.

Also interesting was your response to the question of a broken television. 6 of you said you would try to find someone to take it off your hands for you. Close to 50% would recycle their T.V. This is of course not an option in India. A used T.V. would be sold, hands down.

Finally, you are a very clean bunch. Over 30 of you claimed not to have dropped anything on the ground in the past week. Those who did confess to littering mentioned cigarette butts and food. One Indian respondent confessed to dropping takeaway trays on the ground. This is a great example of the litter problem that exists here in Delhi and across many other parts of the country. And it is something we can all reflect on. In the US we like to imagine that we are moving forward towards an enlightened and modern concept of waste. We keep our streets clean but we live farther away from our waste and fail to see the marginal value of our goods. When I was in Brooklyn I had a broken TV, in fact it’s probably still siting in my old living room. Because honestly, who in the US wants a TV that doesn’t turn on, has no power button, and doesn’t get a digital signal? Recycling, even re-using in this context often means shipping these products to, you guessed it, India!

Check out the actual Survey Results here.

A New Perspective

Jhulta Minara. By Shalabh

If you have been following this blog you know that the issue of litter keeps emerging as one of the biggest hurdles to India’s waste infrastructure and general urban development.  Well last week I visited Ahmedabad, Gujarat, and was served a strong reminder of India’s heterogeneity. In Ahmedabad the infrastructure is there -garbage cans are present. And the public is utilizing them resulting in a stark difference from the streets of Delhi and other large cities (so I’m told). Even outside Ahmdebad I could see that things are working just a bit better than other small towns and roads I’ve traveled in the North West. It also helps that the state is wealthy and that Shri Narendra Modi was adjudged the best state chief minister for three years in a row. There are certainly other places I’ve heard of and hope to visit in India that are even better well known for their waste management, but this trip was at least a taste of the variety of environments India encompasses.

But before I rattle on any further, let me backtrack to the reason for my visit to Gujarat. I was invited to speak about waste management in India at “Celebrating 50th Year of Swarnim Gujarat: The Role of Gujarati Diaspora”. Even though my topic was not exactly diaspora centered, I spoke with a great crowd of NRIs, residents, and students who deeply care about the growth of their state and country. I used the survey I conducted through this blog to demonstrate the difference between how residents in the US and India understand “garbage” in very different ways – something that I will try to expand on in a future post. (Check out the slides from my presentation.) Speaking with conference participants I was happy to find that many of them were already thinking about India’s garbage problem, some had even started drawing up their own solutions.

After three days in the warm company of Dr. Adesh Pal and his family I headed into the city. My first meeting was with Dr. Shrawan Kumar Acharya, author of the Ahmedabad chapter of Solid Waste Practices in Urban Cities, and Dr. Saswat Bandyopadhyay, both of CEPT University. The first thing I noticed in my meetings with these professors was their impressive hands on approach. The walls of their offices held maps of townships, data charts and action plans.

In between sidebars and emails Dr. Bandyopadhyay made an extremely bold suggestion – that the content of India’s waste is not changing. Dr. Bandyopadhyay argues that, contrary to previous government estimates, historical world trends, and a truck full of personal anecdotes, India’s waste remains mostly organic and will probably stay that way for the near future. This most likely due to the informal sector’s role in purchasing and processing material prior to disposal. In addition, Dr. Bandyopadhyay did not see a bright future for large scale implementation of decentralized waste management, another assertion against the grain. He sees the land requirements and reliance of such systems on segregation as too big a hurdle. Pointing out that with time residents’ participation in segregation programs wanes, he believes that constant outreach would be necessary to keep such programs going. This can be an expensive and nuanced task. In general he asserted that life cycle costs for decentralized waste management were unsustainably high.

Dr. Acharya was also keen to talk about waste in market driven terms. He pointed to the movement of rag pickers from large cities to small and medium towns as visible proof of the growing waste problems there. If mega cities are at a loss for a way to landfill and process their waste, towns and villages have even less options. The lack of an informal recycling network in these areas creates a huge void. I touched on some of the effects of this, in my post about the Manimahesh Yatra. A second trend, said Dr. Acharya, was the increase in private sector participation in waste collection. NGOs built the first successful waste collection streams in Ahmedabad. After the waste system became profitable and stable, private companies entered the game. Although they out bid the NGOs for most government contracts, the professor argued that they are a positive force in a growing market. When I visited one of the outbid groups the next day, they had a very different take on the trend.

The Self Employed Women’s Organization (SEWA) is a truly impressive group. Founded in the seventies, it helps women in the informal sector organize into unions and cooperatives. It has grown into a mammoth of an umbrella group, with members in nine other Indian states. Visiting their building in Ahmedabad was a real treat. The offices are simple open layouts and in the whole three story tall complex, I saw a couple kids and a baby but only two men.

SEWA started organizing rag pickers in 1975. Even though waste management is only a small part of what the group does today, they still represent a large population, 45,700 waste pickers between three cooperatives in Ahmedabad. And their influence on the field goes much further.  In 2004 the group began the city’s first decentralized waste management program, helping women organize to secure a contract from the Vejalpur residential authority for door to door collection and segregation. Today this model is ubiquitous in neighborhoods across India. However the cooperative, Shri Karya Siddhi Kargal Kam Mahila Sewa Sahkri Mandli, no longer works in that neighborhood. They were out bid in 2007 by a private company. One SEWA employee says, “It’s like having a baby and seeing it get adopted and raised by someone else.”

The biggest challenge for the waste cooperatives and unions now is to figure out how to secure a livelihood for their women in a competitive market. One group, the Gitanjali Waste Picker Cooperative has opened a facility where members are employed in making stationary. Eye roll! How many groups out there try to create a product like this for a kitschy market? The Zabaleen, waste pickers in Egypt, are certainly doing it. However what is most impressive about this cooperative’s work is that it is just making regular stationary. Just a simple lined notebook, nothing special or remarkable about it. And its purchasers are regular stationary stores and offices. SEWA gifted me with a pen made from rolled up magazine pages and a hard paper cap. Durable, simple, and sustainably average. I’m just trying to stop myself from chewing on it like I do with most other writing implements. SEWA has also started a scrap shop to instill competition into the historically abusive informal recycling market.

The trip was rounded off with a meeting about biomedical waste with a division of Ramky, India’s biggest for-profit formal waste processor, and an adventurous attempt to get into Alang, the world’s largest ship breaking port. However those are stories that will have to be saved for another day. For now I am back in Delhi wandering through the streets with a fully gnawed corn on the cob, searching for a trash can.

Garbage Around: What’s Wrong With This Picture?

Oh Nuts!

That’s right! There is no chocolate, or raisins , or anything else besides almonds. Before you declare false advertising and suggest I send Planters a note so that I can get free nuts for life, cool your jets. This is a re-used bag!  They were purchased from a corner store with the hope of actually finding real trail mix.

Once we became aware of the true contents of the bag, the store owner was kind enough to pull out cashews and other nuts packaged in the same way. He explained to us that a man, who he claims doesn’t have a number, stops by about once a week to deliver the nuts. His hesitance indicated either confusion on his part as to why we had any interest in who provides nuts or that the arrangement was part of the informal economy. I figure it was probably a little bit of both.

After some thought, here is what I think is the most likely scenario. Planters has a factory, either in the US or somewhere else in the world – could be India or could not be since Planters is not a big distributor here. At this factory there are sometimes mistakes on the assembly line. Our Trail Mix bag, which was very clean and crisp in appearance, also claimed to be “resealable,” which unfortunately  it was not. So long story short its possible that the Planters factory(s) sells its faulty packages to an outside dealer, which sells to another dealer, and so on, down the chain finally reaching the the informal nut packager in Delhi. Mind you, I have no proof to back this up and it’s only one of many possible cycles. Could be that the Planters bag was used and discarded, picked up, cleaned, and re-used.

By now you are probably thinking, “How very sanitary.” I’ve been reflecting on standards in India and the US. Personally I don’t see anything wrong with the use of defunct Planters bags for a cheaper market as long as the nuts are still clean. Well I ate them as did friends and not one of us is lying in heap on the floor of a bathroom, so far so good. But who knows that the next package will bring…

The Green Commonwealth Games?

I’ve had a number of people ask me what is going on with Green at Commonwealth Games. So I’ll quickly share some of what I’ve been able to find out. First, to see what promises were made you can check out the CWG’s Eco-Code chart. The committee signed on with United Nations Environment Program to help make the 2010 games the first sustainable Commonwealth event. While there is certainly a movement towards these green goals, there have also been hiccups along the way. Here is a quick summary of some high and low points for the greening of the games.

Afforestation and potted plants are meant to offset the effect of building up the city’s infrastructure, such as the metro, and other CWG construction. Delhi has definitely put resources towards the cause. However the promise of two million new trees has yet to be reached and, as was planned, will extend well past the close of the games. Saplings do not fully cover the cost of a fully grown tree, but that is generally a trade off with infrastructure growth.

The highlight of the Green construction initiatives has been Thyagaraj Stadium, with megawatts of solar panels. In addition, hundreds of CNG powered buses are transporting the athletes and other participants between venues. Fly-ash was used in bricks, and construction debris, like PVC, was reused in the building processes. One key public relations gimmick for the greening of the games, Green Calculators, were to display the total carbon footprint of the games and allow spectators to purchase carbon credits. However, halfway through the games these are still absent. Also of note is the recent sewage back up, one of a couple thus far, caused by used condoms at the Games Village.

And to my favorite subject… garbage. In September it was estimated that 163.2 tons of waste would be generated by the games. Three private vendors were hired to manage the cleanup ISS, Sarvatra and A2Z Maintenance & Engineering Services. In early October  1,100 color-coded waste bins were provided for segregated disposal at Game sites. When I attended an aquatics event this week there were cans labeled for bottle recycling as well as unlabeled green and blue bins. But all the bins contained mixed waste regardless of the label or color. And of course, as soon as you stepped outside the CWG compound there was not a can in site, including inside CWG minted Metro. Convincing people to use the bins, segregation aside, has also proved challenging for the organizers. On the night of the opening ceremonies 20,000 kg of waste was collected, most of it laying on the ground besides empty waste bins.

Once the garbage is collected, plans are to circumvent the traditional informal recycling system and send the refuse to a waste-to-energy plant, a project racked by years of debate and setbacks, which if it successfully opens will be the country’s first. This is bad news for the rag-pickers on top of restrictions they are already facing plying their trade during the games.

For organic wastes, the CWG also made a promise to provide in-house vermicomposting facilities. Whatever is left will be sent to the Ghazipur garbage dump, one of India’s three “sanitary” landfills which are approaching capacity, even without the additional waste from the Games.

So the news is both good and bad, particularly on the waste front. There are also many details that I haven’t covered for the greening of the games including water filtration and choice of locations.  With all of the mishaps and corruption charges leading up to the games, concern for the environment has largely been shelved by the media. I’m hoping there will be much more analysis and data available once the games are done.