Tag Archives: electronic waste

The Economics of Trash, Foreign Affairs Magazine

My article, “The Economics of Trash”, was just released on the Foreign Affairs website.  Here is a teaser, and you can check out the full piece at ForeignAffairs.com

“The streets of India’s major cities look dirty, piles of waste rot in the corners of buildings, and plastic bottles crunch underfoot. But the grit hides an informal waste collection system so effective that, despite an increase in the sale of disposable, non-organic consumer goods in India in recent years, the trash that ends up in the hands of municipal garbage facilities is over 50 percent organic — that is, mostly food waste. In 2009, food scraps made up only 21 percent of non-recycled waste in the United States. India’s ubiquitous trash-pickers may seem to some an unfortunate byproduct of Western-style consumption, but where others see garbage many Indians see opportunity. In an informal glass market in Bangalore, I was offered three rupees for a green glass bottle. By selling three bottles, I could have earned enough for a local bus ride.

The country’s informal recycling sector, however, can only generate so much profit. It is constrained by its lack of capital and long-term investment…”  Go to Full Article

Understanding EWaste

During my research into municipal solid waste, I’ve had the opportunity to learn a lot about ewaste by talking to workers in the industry, interviewing leaders in organizations supporting better ewaste processing in India, and making a few site visits. My first experience with ewaste was a trip to an informal circuit board processor just outside of Delhi. Most of the pictures in this post are from that visit, which left me feeling slightly hung over and absolutely depressed. However a second trip to the second hand electronic dealers and ewaste recycling vendors in Seelampur, in Delhi, and a trip to Bangalore left me with many more questions. Ewaste is a one in all conflict with pollution, over-consumption, and neo-colonialism intertwined. Images of women and children picking apart old computers are now ubiquitous proof of global demise. But if you have been following me at all you won’t be surprised to hear that the issue is a bit more nuanced than we all imagine.

India is not a major importer of ewaste, or at least according to official numbers it is not – import laws currently prohibit the import of electronics for waste processing. Still in 2004 the national ewaste industry, according to Toxics Links, generated an annual revenue of $1.5 Billion, with expectations for major growth. In 2005, the waste advocacy group SAAHAS estimated that gold extraction

Women cleaning circuit boards.

alone from Bangalore’s budding e-waste recycling industry was worth about $1 million.

Some of this revenue is generated through imported waste – illegally or under the guise of donations. Even so ewaste in India is not simply a problem of developed countries cost dumping.

Indian consumption of computers, mobile phones, and televisions is generating about 400,000 tonnes of waste annually and is expected to grow at 10-15% per year. (As a reference, the US and China are the world leaders of EWaste production, with 2.3 and 3 million annual tonnes respectively.

Waste water drainage at an informal circuit board processor

China, also happens to be the world’s largest ewaste importer.) Even without imports this is enough to provide a steady supply of materials to the waste mining industry. India, following China’s lead, is crossing a line. It’s anyone’s guess as to whether the country will one day become a major force as an importer or exporter of ewaste, or both.

The danger posed by electronics arise from the mishandling of highly toxic chemicals such as lead, mercury, cadmium, PVC, beryllium, and flame retardants. In addition, acid wash, cyanide, and fire are employed to release the precious metals, all of which pose a danger to the handler. India has plenty of informal/backyard recyclers with terrible working and safety standards. However the industry is also extraordinary for its diversity. A circuit board processing operator might expose his/her workers to the fumes of a smelter and let  children play in polluted mud.

Plastic and second hand keyboard/printer dealer in Seelampur, Delhi

At the same time a different merchant, another cog in a long chain, might simply be in the business of breaking plastic and metal for sale and segregating refurbish able keyboards and printers. Such decentralization of the informal sector makes regulation of the industry all the more difficult.

Managers and owners of informal e-waste facilities are generally uneducated and running on small profit margins. Often they are not aware of the extent of the hazards in their business. While they do not work constantly with the hazardous substances that their laborers handle, they are at the facilities day in and day out. They take no more measures for their own on-site health than they do for their employees, which is nil. As is also the case in municipal solid waste, where safety standards are implemented the laborers themselves can be the biggest challenge to meeting new policy. The founder of E-Parisaraa, the country’s first sanitary ewaste processing facility, remembers when

These women work without gloves or masks, others in their group wear both.

he began operations he had to resort to threatening workers with fines if they did not wear gloves and masks, even after they had received training on the importance of such safety measures.

Top down supported centralization of the industry is required in order to eradicate danger to health and environment. In fact formalization campaigns are already underway in India, through the effort of NGOs and some government support. European governments, with a very active role played by the German aid organization Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (Formerly GTZ), have donated large

Open dumping behind circuit board processing site.

amounts of money to helping these campaigns. Including E-Parisaraa, which began as a formal and regulated company, there are already four formal for-profit ewaste processing centers in India that operate with international safety standards. Some of the waste that is processed in these units can still end up in the informal sector in India or dumped in other countries. However with a more centralized industry the trickle down of pollutants will be easier to monitor by the government and consumer watch dogs. This will be a long process, and will not find success if it focuses solely on the goal of meeting international safety standards and labor regulations. Rather it starts with teaching those in the informal sector the basics of business – how to keep accounts and pay taxes – while providing them with convincing arguments and incentives to stay in the system.

Children playing at an informal waste processing site.

The biggest hazard to health is posed by smelters, where circuit boards are melted, and phosphorous from the processing of screens. However, many of the other dangers can be addressed with surprisingly simple measures – masks, gloves, better soaps, and waste water management. Counter to common logic, when ISO standards are followed ewaste is a two way street. Without any companies meeting international standards for circuit board processing in India, E-Paisaraa has been selling its PCP boards and other intricate ewaste elements to Umicore for further mining in Belgium. The founder, P.Parthasarathy, is also working on a plan to sell circuit boards collected in the informal sector to Umicore, thereby taking them out of harmful circulation in India.

International regulation of the Ewaste industry is as difficult as you can imagine. The Basel Convention on the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste has attempted to clamp down on the ewaste trade. However, without ratification of the treaty by the US the convention is still working with baby teeth. Ewaste is also one of those things, like

Sitting down with a manager at an informal ewaste processing site.

old ships – that I would like to cover soon, which is a hazy category under the legal definition of hazardous waste. For example second hand computers which are sold or donated for use in another country might breakdown after they have arrived. They may also be imported illegally for the sole purpose of waste processing. But how do you tell the difference between the two in transit and how do you punish those who import illegally if there is no domestic monitoring. Legally it is unclear where the responsibility for such “wastes” lie.

Concerned waste producers are left between a rock and a hard place. It is nearly impossible to guarantee that your mobile phone or computer or television will be processed in a safe and secure manner. Although President Obama supports the drive for more domestic ewaste processing, the industry remains expensive as compared to ISO regulated companies in developing countries  and lags behind techno savvy processors in Europe. Many states are now enacting laws to ban any export of ewaste. However it’s unclear to me how effective banning the international ewaste trade will be. Another interesting route to address the ewaste problem is in the production processes. I’m not just talking about direct processing waste, which by the way is a forgotten problem in electronics. Better product design can help extend product life, replacement, and repair. Such thinking is not going to solve the waste problem on its own. But in a world of gray it’s an excellent way to start.

Survey Results

Thanks to everyone who participated in my survey. The  majority of you were from the US but there were respondents from all over the globe. Considering the highly scientific collection method and the statistically relevant response of 41 participants, I’m ready to make some sweeping statements about humanity’s relationship with trash.

cardboard

Four of you said you would save these for storage or shipping. I'm disappointed, I would have said Fort Building.

Recycling definitely won the day. Over 85% of you said that you would put used cardboard and a plastic tub in your recycling. Now the cardboard was probably an obvious answer. But let’s think a little bit about the plastic bottle. Although many of you do not have this in your homes, these types of jugs are typically made from  polycarbonate plastic (#7) and are not recycled. In the past year PET jugs which are recyclable have increased but the US recycling rate for all PET bottles in 2009 was still only 31%.

Also consider this. Garbage in most legal and policy definitions is defined as something discarded, or which is of no further value to the user. So

Water Jug

Some creative thinkers in this group! One of you said you would save this jug to use as a penny jar. Another insisted he/she could use it to make beer.

even when you place something in the recycling, it’s still garbage! When I asked these same questions to a room full of Indian students and lecturers a considerable number of them claimed that they would sell the cardboard. And the water jug, which is in common household use, is in fact on deposit and would be traded or returned to the manufacturer. What does this mean? It means that in India cardboard is not garbage, plastic water jugs are not garbage because for the end-user they contain a monetary value.

Also interesting was your response to the question of a broken television. 6 of you said you would try to find someone to take it off your hands for you. Close to 50% would recycle their T.V. This is of course not an option in India. A used T.V. would be sold, hands down.

Finally, you are a very clean bunch. Over 30 of you claimed not to have dropped anything on the ground in the past week. Those who did confess to littering mentioned cigarette butts and food. One Indian respondent confessed to dropping takeaway trays on the ground. This is a great example of the litter problem that exists here in Delhi and across many other parts of the country. And it is something we can all reflect on. In the US we like to imagine that we are moving forward towards an enlightened and modern concept of waste. We keep our streets clean but we live farther away from our waste and fail to see the marginal value of our goods. When I was in Brooklyn I had a broken TV, in fact it’s probably still siting in my old living room. Because honestly, who in the US wants a TV that doesn’t turn on, has no power button, and doesn’t get a digital signal? Recycling, even re-using in this context often means shipping these products to, you guessed it, India!

Check out the actual Survey Results here.